Mandatory Drug Testing for Student Athletes - 958 Words.
There are many arguments against drug testing in schools, especially random drug testing. One reason athletes get tested is for the use of performance-enhancing drugs, which many would argue is a fair reason for drug testing, so that no one player has an advantage over another. Aside from this, there are other issues with drug testing students, regardless of whether or not they are athletes.
Testing student athletes randomly under suspicion of the use of drugs is unreasonable when there is no apparent evidence. There is no point of in violating a student’s rights to determine whether or not an athlete might be under the influence of performance enhancing drugs (PEDs). Although some may point out that professional athletes are legally subject to drug tests, unlike students, they.
By this athletic drug testing, the school officials are targeting the wrong students. Testing for drugs sends a mixed message to students. It may send the message to students that to perform better, an athlete should consider using performance-altering drugs. This will also force drug-using student athletes to either no longer participate or to try avoiding detection. There are various ways to.
List of Cons of Drug Testing in Sports. 1. It can cause drug use among athletes to get worse. While drug testing methods have become more sophisticated, illegal drugs that athletes are taking have also gotten more complicated to avoid detection, which means that a dangerous practice has also become worse.
Mandatory drug testing for high school athletes should be required because it decreases drug use in schools, is relatively inexpensive, and can prevent drug use and or abuse that can lead to a lifelong addiction. An example of an issue with mandatory drug testing was the Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton case. In this case the Vernonia School District, which is located in Oregon, requires any.
Testing athletes for drug use has been occurring since the mid-1970's, when efforts to reduce drug use has really increased. These tests have been passed by the Supreme Court, but are left up to the school district as to whether or not administer the tests. In general, the tests, have been conducted infrequently and with varying degrees of success. Not only a violation of rights, but testing.
The Essay on Drug Testing In High School Athletics. models than any other student in the high school. The whole thought of this is appalling. Random drug testing of student athletes is costly, ineffective, and. th, 1995, the Supreme Court upheld random testing for drugs in public high school athletic programs. A statement released by Justice Antonin Scalia asserted. Works Cited.